Dependency Resolution difference between Package and yum

[https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnARWkgfcLN0_65FMSodEEaebtElcsVCH8]

I'm running BCFG2 1.1.0 on CentOS 5.5 and there seems to be an issue with the Package plug-in. I have an Apache+PHP bundle which contains the following packages:

<Package name='httpd'/>
<Package name='php'/>
<Package name='php-pecl-apc'/>
<Package name='php-pecl-memcache'/>

The YUM sources are set to the official CentOS 5.5, EPEL and REMI. Now BCFG2 want to install php-devel on the web servers whereas YUM does not require this.

[https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnARWkgfcLN0_65FMSodEEaebtElcsVCH8]

debug log generated using bcfg2-info

[solj]

It appears as though yum's dependency handling is incorrect in this case. In your debug log, it shows php-pecl-apc requires /usr/bin/pecl. php-pear provides /usr/bin/pecl and therefore satisfies that dependency. The php-pear package lists php-devel as a requirement.

Packages: Package php-pecl-apc added requirements set(['rtld(GNU_HASH)', 'libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)', 'libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)', 'libc.so.6()(64bit)', 'libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)', 'php(api)', '/usr/bin/pecl', '/bin/sh', 'librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)', 'php(zend-abi)', 'librt.so.1()(64bit)'])
Packages: requirement /usr/bin/pecl satisfied by set(['php-pear'])
Packages: Package php-pear added requirements set(['php-devel', 'php-cli'])

[https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawnSjgovXZr-_V3vGkvMSR0pc5LDykRc1Nc]

This is resolved in ​https://github.com/solj/bcfg2/commit/bd0fd1c4c32864414b60b51828c79198503cb3f6